What ‘IF’: Perceptions & Weapons

Dana turned, pushed past a young employee, and walked back into the clothing store all bristled and ready for a fight. How dare that middle age woman challenge her honesty?

Approaching the counter, Dana began telling the surprised woman just what she thought of her and it wasn’t too awfully nice. She suggested she get new glasses and that she better know what she was talking about before accusing her of anything. Just who did she think she was? She was nothing but a low-life clerk that couldn’t get a better job if it was handed to her.

Another woman rushed over and tried to indicate she thought there must be a problem. Dana rudely and fiercely shook her finger at the target of her fury. “That woman. That woman dared to accuse me of stealing.”

“What?” The intercepting woman exclaimed? “You think she accused you of stealing? You misunderstood.”

“No, I didn’t,” the red-faced young woman continued to scream. “Don’t try to protect this stupid, irrelevant change collector.”

The mediator abruptly stepped back and eyed Dana with disgust. “That’s enough. It’s time you leave.”

Still lost in her fury, she exclaimed, “Me leave? I’m the customer. She better not be here when I come back.”

“I don’t think you understand. You are no longer welcome here. Do not come back.”

“What? You’re taking her side over mine? I’m the customer and she is nobody and this ignorant nobody accused me of stealing.” Dana continued screaming and pointing her finger at the focus of her anger. “And don’t try to defend her. She said I was the one that had the blouse.”

“The woman you are so rudely and wrongly insulting, happens to be the owner of this and many other stores. Secondly, if you had paid attention, you would have noticed that we have a promotion going on. The first person to try on a particular blouse was to be the winner of $500 merchandise and dinner out. You were that winner. She was indicating you were the one that won.” The impatient manager responded. “If you had paid attention to what was going on around you and listened to what was actually said, we would all be celebrating your win. Instead, you reacted inappropriately based upon a false perception. Worse, you refused to listen when I tried to clarify and instead went on reacting to what you wrongly thought happened at the hands of this lady you viciously attacked with your false accusations and wrongful insults.”

The incident above is a composite of things I have seen in life and meant merely as an example to make a point. People do tend to react to what they think they know… what they think they saw… what they think they heard… rather than what actually transpired. They just don’t always make it so obvious and they don’t always get called on it. Sometimes, it is a pack thing, with everyone responding to the same incorrect belief. It’s never right and it is never good.

I’ve often written about the Sara and Gary Harvey case. It’s an ongoing saga that has its ups and downs as to the intensity of wrong that is transpiring and it always leaves me feeling like the woman who rushed over and kept trying to explain there was a misunderstanding and that the reaction has been to a false perception, rather than to what was actually taking place. You see, like Dana, those who should be slowing down and taking a good look at what is going on — seem too busy reacting to a wrongful perception and closing all else out. Some simply will not listen. Some simply will not consider they made a mistake. Some simply seem to feel the woman behind the counter is a nobody that freely deserves all their anger and insults. Sometimes though, the nobodies aren’t the bad guys they are assumed to be. Sometimes they are, instead, actually somebodies who were merely trying to do something good for someone else and that good got misunderstood and blown out of portion and into a rage that never should have been. Sometimes those nobodies, that are actually somebodies, are people like Sara Harvey, who were wrongly labeled by someone like our story’s Dana. The difference is… in our story… someone was there to defend and clarify. In actual life, those wrongful labels sometimes never get shaken and too often all (or most) things to follow are reactions to those inaccurate perceptions that continue to define all that happens.

Full Article and Source:
What ‘IF’: Perceptions & Weapons

13 Responses to “What ‘IF’: Perceptions & Weapons”

  1. Thelma Says:

    True! Some of use are more paranoid than others, but not without cause.I used to have a large blackboard on the counter in my country kitchen, to remind me – in large, bold letters:"PARANOIA PAYS!"

  2. StandUp Says:

    Thank you for this reminder. There are two sides to every story and both must be heard before a decision is rushed into.

  3. Anonymous Says:

    What "they" say about Sara Harvey is accepted as truth without even asking Sara for her side, because they're not interested in her side. They're only interesting is harassing her.

  4. Mrs. Harvey Says:

    Well, standup if we could only make the judges understand this!

  5. Anonymous Says:

    This is exactly what happens in Florida under Judge Patrick Caddell. He and his, appointed by him and ordered by him, guardains and attorneys can say and do what ever they want and he just backs them. They have produced nothing truthful and have hurt my mother Retta Rickow, terrible, physically and financially, all the while telling people I high jacked an ambulance and tried to poison my mother with a coke. Could not be more far from the truth. Do you think they have any witnesses or allowed us any. No! Does anyone believe them, No! Judge Caddell should be in jail for fraud and elder abuse! He is not a Judge! he is a crook! Two sides are never heard in his court room, only his!

  6. Norma Says:

    Family is often maligned in court in order to get them out of the way and silence their voices.Who's to blame? Bad judges and bad lawyers.

  7. Ben Says:

    And we expect judges to be our referees and make sure that both sides can be heard.Boy are we wrong!

  8. Anonymous Says:

    Very well said. I think, however, the people involved in the Harvey case aren't interested in Gary Harvey or the truth. They're just playing their little head and control games and I bet they don't even have the humanity to even think beyond the surface.

  9. Carole Says:

    I think bad guardians, like those in the Harvey case, know exactly what they're doing and there is no reasoning with people who have no empathy or heart.Maybe these people have a terrible home life so they take it out on somebody they can push around. I don't know.But the message in this article is beautiful. Thank you.

  10. Cindy Says:

    Judges should read this article!

  11. Sue Says:

    People churned into products to feed the protection industry nothing at all to do about the well being of the product. This is business, a dirty business at best. KARMA to all involved in harming Gary Harvey. Prayers for Gary and his loyal wife Sara.

  12. Becky Says:

    I love this! And it's so true. Thank you………

  13. Anonymous Says:

    Well said. Perceptions can very easily be turned into weapons against innocent people.What is the guardian's perception of Sara Harvey? We don't really know. We do know it behooves them to paint her with a dark brush. And we also know Gary Harvey is helpless ot defend his wife.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: